“Judges and officers shalt thou make thee in all thy gates, which the L-RD thy G-d giveth thee, tribe by tribe; and they shall judge the people with righteous judgment.”
– Deuteronomy 16:19, JPS 1917 Tanach
“Whatsoever thy hand attaineth to do by thy strength, that do; for there is no work, nor device, nor knowledge, nor wisdom, in the grave, whither thou goest.” – Ecclesiastes 9:10, JPS
According to Mei HaShiloach, it is important to emphasize the last phrase of this passage, “… so that you may live.” He explains that the Zohar connects this passage to a verse from Ecclesiastes, that notes how we are only able to do mitzvoth, and acquire knowledge & wisdom in this life” (Ecclesiastes 9:10). Therefore, whatever is done with mishpat, literally, judgment, as well as discernment, awareness and mindfulness will remain with us, “so that we may live.”
That is to say everything done with mishpat will continue to be part of us, and on our record for the good in the Book of Life. Yet, whatever is not done in judgment, dissipates, hinted at by the latter part of the verse, as the Meir Shiloach explains, if done with mishpat, our good deeds will not descend into Sheol.
To have a good sense of discernment, means to know what is permitted and what is forbidden to us. In our lives, discernment is more important than our feelings. This is an important tenet of Judaism, and what differentiates living for sake of a set of higher values versus living to only please oneself in this world.
Without HaShem’s guidance, we are subject to the irresoluteness of our convictions. Without a Higher Authority to appeal to, we are setting ourselves up to become the purveyors of truth. Instead, we must subject ourselves to HaShem’s sovereignty over our lives.
“A word fitly spoken is like apples of gold in settings of silver”
– Proverbs 25:11, JPS
Raise me up above my thoughts, so that I do not equate ideas with personhood. We are more than our beliefs, ideologies and political views. Perhaps, if more of us realized this, rather than falling prey to the unspoken adage, “the personal is political,” the world would be less divisive. A word well-chosen is better than an onslaught of personal opinions, or flow of ideological ideas. A barrage of convictions held, delivered as a statement of faith, may truly get the point across to another person who holds different views; however, this does no make for good conversation, nor bridging the divide between the entrenched positions have lurking below their personas.
I, myself, and included as one who needs to hear these words, written partly from personal experience, as well as from an understanding gained through what others have recommended for the sake of conversations. Meeting another person where he or she is at is crucial. Although, sometimes, I have to backtrack in a conversation, and explain directly that I’d rather learn more about the other person’s viewpoints than espouse my own, I am making my way closer the better conversation. Sometimes silence for the sake of peace is the best remedy.
Yet, when, it is more a matter of defending truth, especially that of the existence of G-d and the authority of scripture, as well as the actuality of Biblical events, like the revelation on Mount Sinai, I can hardly keep silent. For the sake of conscience, I must speak my mind, as well as a deterrent against being influenced by the words of others, intended to undermine my own faith. Yet, can I do any of this with a smile on my face, and compassion in my heart toward the other? It is challenging to maintain a balanced approach to open and honest communication, for sure.
As long as I am contributing to the world, something of importance, I am content in my efforts to bring awareness, positivity, and renewal with a conscience focused on the values that I uphold as a human being with the temerity to speak boldly about what is important amidst the chaos.
Recently, I had an experience while reading a book by Viktor Frankl, wherein I resonated with a passage having to do with a man who decided to reclaim his life. I felt as if it was also time for me to do so. These kinds of spiritual motivations occur in real-life situations as well. Those whom inadvertently bring us back to the roots of ourselves, may do so unknowingly; yet, these encounters have been arranged from shomayim (heaven) for the sake of our spiritual growth.
I am reminded how years ago, an activist acquaintance of mine, when I associated with Leftists, told me that I can not remain neutral regarding the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. He framed his statement in a manner that connoted neutrality as a stance that was not moral. Indeed, reflecting upon this now, I concur, in light of what Simon Wiesenthal said, that to remain silent in the face of evil is to be complicit. I am paraphrasing his well-known statement. And, now, I cannot remain silent.
I am disgusted with the video footage I watched of anti-Israel and pro-Hamas supporters outside the Amtrak Union station in Washington D.C. The facsimile of the Liberty Bell was vandalized, as was the statue giving credence to the discovery of a New World by Christopher Columbus. It is here, where a year and a half ago, I spoke with someone who attempted to give me advice, pertaining to my relentless cause of raising awareness of the dangers of Woke Ideology. He seemed to think that in doing so, I was placing myself in the fray, by countering the ideology, as if I was no different than them. This has remained with me ever since, and is why I try to transcend my critiques by making clear my values, and offering a way to higher ground. So, here goes my attempt to contribute something more than reactionary feedback to the chaos that plagued D.C. today when Netanyahu spoke at Congress.
What is the angst that drives protestors? Frustration is a key element, as mentioned by Eric Hoffer, in his book, The True Believer. It is the angst that fuels the fire of activists and would be do-gooders, today’s social justice warriors who rise up against the establishment in general for the sake of so-called vague sense of freedom, with cries of “liberation,” unaware of the original meaning intended. From the Marcusian mentality, liberation is that which frees human beings from the constraints of morals, so that their impulses can reign. That is the underbelly of radicalism that energizes the Leftist rage against the machine.
The same chants twenty years ago, that I heard in Philadelphia and L.A. are being heard in Washington D.C. “The people united shall never be defeated,” and “whose streets our streets.” I would think that they must also be chanting “No Justice No Peace,” the rallying cries of the Left. Yet, the pro-Hamas activists are not the kin of the radical Left, per se; rather they are the ilk of barbarism that plagues the world. It is appalling to witness their support for a terrorist group that committed horrific atrocities on October Seventh in Israel.
I would like to be able to get along with people in my social sphere, including those who believe, think, and live differently than me, depending upon their ideological beliefs or casual attachment to their sense of Jewishness. I am guilty to of a casual attitude toward my own level of Yiddishkeit, and suffer when I deviate from the path. Yet, as conveyed in the above-mentioned poem, both the chaff and the wheat are mixed together within the congregation of the faithful and the faithless. And, outside the perimeter of my very small world, I see humanity through a blurry lens, unable to see seeds of redemption or a spark of renewal in those who condemn themselves by way of their own inhumanity.
I will not take up a sign to protest, nor counter-protest; however, I will take up the pen, figuratively speaking, while I type out these words on my keyboard: To remain silent in the face of evil is to be complicit with the worst traits of humanity as they arise in the hearts of mankind, sentenced to despair by their own unbelief in a G-d who has already promised that through following His commandments, we may transcend our base desires, hateful inclinations, and misguided intentions.
This is the message that needs to be proclaimed, in like manner that a university student paraded a Moshaich Now flag through the U.C.L.A. pro-Palestinian campus encampment, during students protests, only a month or two ago. Of course, I defer to the power of words, rather than any kind of violence, as enshrined in the scene in the Indiana Jones movie, where the historian says, “The pen is mightier than the sword.”
Ultimately, what is needed is compassion toward others, who disagree with us, and forgiveness of those who tread upon our toes. Yet, this only works for certain within the framework of a mutual agreement between those in a group of people committed to the same values. Expressing radical compassion to those who are our enemies is above and beyond the call duty. Even so, at least not partaking in their own sins of hatred and intolerance is a step in the right direction. We are all called toward righteousness in accord with HaShem’s divine vision for the world. It is clear from the scriptural accounts of that eschatological view, that not everyone will agree with The Plan. There are times when we must look after our own conscience, making sure to preserve the values that we uphold, so that we may remain human, in alignment with the Divine Blueprint. This may include speaking our mind for the sake of Truth. Eventually, only G-d will sort out the wheat from the chaff.
Lag b’Omer is the 33rd day of the counting of the Omer – the 49 day period between Passover and Shavuot. The day has several clear historical references, most significantly, being the day that the plague that took 24,000 of Rabbi Akiva’s students ceased. With his five remaining students, he began again to promote Torah instruction to his students, including Shimon bar Yochai.
The message being that because the reason given for the plague is the baseless dissension amongst the students, the importance of respect towards others who have differing opinions and viewpoints, inclusive of various interpretations should be respected, despite the differences. A timely message for today’s world, wherein the overflowing messages of cancel culture seem to o.k. intolerance, disrespect, and raising one’s own viewpoints above all others.
Regarding R’ Shimon bar Yochai, it is claimed by the most devoted advocates of the Zohar that the author of the premier mystical literature of Judaism is indeed R’Shimon bar Yochai. Yet, not everyone agrees with this claim; in particular, from a scholarly perspective, the work has been shown to have been written by Moses de Leon of Spain.
When the Aramaic writing is deciphered according to its grammar and other idiosyncrasies, these have much in common with the grammatical structures and manner of conveying ideas at the time and place that Moses de Leon lived. Additionally, there is testimony given by his wife in a letter, that indicates he wrote the work, yet because of his own relative obscurity, assigned the authorship to Shimon bar Yochai to bring an air of authenticity to the writing.
The historical Shimon bar Yochai, according to a reference in the Talmud, lived in a cave for many years, in order to escape persecution by the Romans. When he left the cave, he was given almost supernatural powers in the Talmudic account, as if he acquired these during his meditations in the cave. A story that was later developed into a greater myth by the author of the Zohar, assigning the mystical treatise itself to his authorship.
Yet, any astute reader can note that the “companions” of the character, Shimon bar Yochai in the accounts given over in the Zohar, are historical personages whom did not even live during the same time span as each other. Yet, they all gather around Shimon bar Yochai as if they are alive and well, irrespective of when they actually lived.
While it is true that the Zohar does contain many ideas, teachings, and Torah gems, not found in more traditional works, these mysteries of Torah are revealed by the actual author based upon his knowledge of prior mystical treatises. So, perhaps, it may be considered as a moot issue, who the author of the Zohar is, if indeed its words still help to further understand the secrets of Torah and give an enlightening and inspired deeper layer of meaning.
On the other hand, it is disconcerting that Shimon bar Yochai is described as a holy lamp, and elevated as the chief expositor of the mysteries of Torah, giving an air of legitimacy to certain concepts conveyed in the Zohar that are foreign to Torah, Tanach, and Talmud, such as gilgulim, transmigration, and the error of reincarnation. The specific teachings in regard to reincarnation do not bring light into the world; rather, they cast a shadow of darkness upon the truths of Torah. Moreover, the concept of reincarnation detracts from the clear understanding having to do with the Tehillas HaMeisim (resurrection of the dead). Whereas, the soul is restored to the body and we are judged according to how we lived this one life that we are all given.
Furthermore, glorifying Shimon bar Yochai seems to detract from the expectation of the prophet, Eliyahu HaNavi revealing the secrets of Torah, upon his return. Incidentally, since the prophet ascended into Heaven on a chariot, his return would not be counted as reincarnation. Additionally, the role of the Messiah in part is to also, even moreso, bring to light the essential Torah truths for the generation, that will see his crowning as King in Jerusalem, at the beginning of the sabbatical millennium, when G-d’s Kingdom is ushered into existence. HIs light cannot be supplanted by the larger-than-life author of the Zohar, despite how many secrets it contains. So, I believe, if studying the Zohar, we should keep in mind that time when the greater secrets will be revealed.
Ad mosai – how long until the fallen sukkah of David is restored?
“In that day will I raise up the tabernacle of David that is fallen, and close up the breaches thereof, and I will raise up his ruins, and I will build it as in the days of old.” – Amos 9:11, JPS 1917 Tanach
How well am I able to maintain an active participation in the foundational truths of my life? Do I only have an intellectual understanding of those truths? Or, am I able to ground those truths within the framework of my everyday life? Moreover, when faced with challenges, within and without, how well will that foundation prove to support the overall structure of my belief and practice?
The stronger my foundation, the greater my ability to endure the storms of life. If my foundation is like a house built upon a rock, then it will be more secure than a foundation built upon sand. A solid foundation is one that will withstand the changing seasons, because the underlying principles are founded upon timeless truths. Yet, a foundation built upon the shifting sands of societal norms will not last. Without a firm foundation we will sink into this quagmire of confusion. Without building blocks that will provide a sure foundation, a structure built upon empty truths, ultimately, will not be established.
The measure of strength of a foundation may very well be its resistance to change; therefore, only time-tested truths will ultimately prevail. The establishment of any foundation that is not in accord with those truths will ultimately fail to provide the shelter that only can only be provided through what is Heaven sent.
From the beginning of the creation of the world, G-d used His discernment, to separate the light from the darkness. This separation is a phenomenon that we may observe every day at dusk and dawn. The transition at twilight into nighttime, and at sunrise into daytime.
The Targum Neofiti emphasizes that G-d separated by word between light and darkness. We take the separation of light and darkness as a natural occurrence that seems effortless on the part of what most human beings refer to as nature.
Since there was no Biblical Hebrew word for nature, modern Hebrew uses the word Teva. The point that I would like to make is that the initial separation was not effortless, nor a natural phenomenon; rather, it was a principle of separation built into the fabric of Creation.
According to Rashi, because the light was good, it was not appropriate “that light and darkness should function together in a confused manner” (commentary on Genesis 1:4, sefaria.org). A parallel can be drawn to moral sphere, wherein the same rule may apply.
This tenet would caution us against the mixture of light and dark in our thinking, and how we approach the challenges in life; it may help decrease the confusion prevalent in society today. The current chaos of the world derives from the admixture of good and evil that permeates society. It is fueled by the flames of bitterness, animosity, and hostility.
Yet, the line of good and evil runs through the heart of every human (Solzhenitysn). This must be acknowledged by all decent people with a conscience in order to maintain a balanced perspective. The designation of people groups leads to an us and them mentality, as if the moral integrity of the in-group compels them to be sinless in their own eyes.
On the contrary, we must examine ourselves, all the moreso, in order to better challenge evil. In a world where the difference between good and evil is blurred we need the discernment that is able to separate light from darkness. “The words You inscribed give light” (Ps. 119:130, JPSN).
Mankind was given free will, as denoted by the two inclinations, inferred, according to the sages, by the doubling of the Hebrew letter “yud,” in the word yetzer, when used to describe the creation of man (Genesis 2:7). Notably, the word, yetzer, when used to describe the creation of animals, only uses one “yud,” because animals only have one inclination, i.e., their “instinctual drive.” (Genesis 2:19). Yet, mankind has both a good inclination and an evil inclination.
Additionally, there are consequences for the choices we make in life: “I have set before thee life and death, the blessing and the curse; therefore choose life, that thou mayest live” (Deuteronomy 30:19, JPS). If we follow our good inclination, by focusing on H’Shem, and performing the mitzvot, we will receive blessings in our lives. Conversely, if we permit our evil inclination to get the better of us, the consequences are described as curses.
We need to establish our proper conduct in this world. We are commanded “to love the L-RD thy G-d, to walk in His ways, and to keep His commandments” (Deuteronomy 30:16, JPS). This includes making rational decisions for ourselves in accordance with G-d’s will. We also need to accept responsibility for the choices we make; if we err, there will be negative consequences.
Doing good starts with awareness of the struggle between the yetzer tov (good inclination) and the yetzer hara (evil inclination). H’Shem encourages to choose the good by way of His promptings. We may do so by attempting to reign over the emotions and desires of our heart, that could otherwise lead us astray. Our rational mind needs to be set above this struggle, in order to make the right decision in any given moment. Sifting through our subjective experience, we need to sort out right from wrong. We need G-d’s directive in order to do so.
“See, I have placed before you this day life and good, death and evil.” – Deuteronomy 30:15
How can we freely choose, based on information that will permit us to make an informed decision? If we know right from wrong, then, we should have enough discernment to make the best decision for all who will be affected by that decision. Yet, if we lack discernment between right and wrong, and knowledge of good and evil, what precedent do we have to base our decisions upon? This is the tragedy of post-modern culture, that deprived itself of truth.
G-d is like a loving-parent, who sets clear boundaries and expectations with consequences for the child’s behavior. Out of the mouth of G-d proceeds the reward for doing good, and the judgments for wrongdoing (Lamentations 3:38). If we are unaware of G-d’s commitment to our moral condition, wherein He has made everything clear to us for our sake, then we are no better off than if we were in unchartered waters.
If we attempt to navigate life without a map, what can our decisions be based upon, except for subjective notions of right and wrong, that might be vague and ill-defined? The truths established in scripture are time-tested, and will not be undone by the attempt to undermine Western civilization today.
This has been going on for centuries, ever since the French Revolution and the Enlightenment. And, now, the cultural revolution that has captured the institutions of society is wreaking havoc upon classical Western values. Yet, the value of scripture, and the qualities that are promoted by its teachings, such as truth, forgiveness, and compassion are even more important now than ever before. Our humanity is at risk if we fail to embrace the virtues that make us human.
Lag b’Omer is the 33rd day of the counting of the Omer – the 49 day period between Passover and Shavuot. The day has several clear historical references, most significantly, being the day that the plague that took 24,000 of Rabbi Akiva’s students ceased. With his five remaining students, he began again to promote Torah instruction to his students, including Shimon bar Yochai.
The message being that because the reason given for the plague is the baseless dissension amongst the students, the importance of respect towards others who have differing opinions and viewpoints, inclusive of various interpretations should be respected, despite the differences. A timely message for today’s world, wherein the overflowing messages of cancel culture seem to o.k. intolerance, disrespect, and raising one’s own viewpoints above all others.
Regarding R’ Shimon bar Yochai, it is claimed by the most devoted advocates of the Zohar that the author of the premier mystical literature of Judaism is indeed R’Shimon bar Yochai. Yet, not everyone agrees with this claim; in particular, from a scholarly perspective, the work has been shown to have been written by Moses de Leon of Spain. When the Aramaic writing is deciphered according to its grammar and other idiosyncrasies, these have much in common with the grammatical structures and manner of conveying ideas at the time and place that Moses de Leon lived. Additionally, there is testimony given by his wife in a letter, that indicates he wrote the work, yet because of his own relative obscurity, assigned the authorship to Shimon bar Yochai to bring an air of authenticity to the writing.
The historical Shimon bar Yochai, according to a reference in the Talmud, lived in a cave for many years, in order to escape persecution by the Romans. When he left the cave, he was given almost supernatural powers in the Talmudic account, as if he acquired these during his meditations in the cave. A story that was later developed into a greater myth by the author of the Zohar, assigning the mystical treatise itself to his authorship. Yet, any astute reader can note that the “companions” of the character, Shimon bar Yochai in the accounts given over in the Zohar, are historical personages whom did not even live during the same time span as each other. Yet, they all gather around Shimon bar Yochai as if they are alive and well, irrespective of when they actually lived.
While it is true that the Zohar does contain many ideas, teachings, and Torah gems, not generally found in more traditional works, these mysteries of Torah are revealed by the actual author based upon his knowledge of prior mystical treatises. So, perhaps, it may be considered as a moot issue, who the author of the Zohar is, if indeed its words still help to further understand the secrets of Torah, and give an enlightening and inspired deeper layer of meaning.
On the other hand, it is disconcerting that Shimon bar Yochai is described as a holy lamp, and elevated as the chief expositor of the mysteries of Torah, giving an air of legitimacy to certain concepts conveyed in the Zohar that are foreign to Torah, Tanach, and Talmud, such as gilgulim, transmigration, and the error of reincarnation. The specific teachings in regard to reincarnation do not bring light into the world; rather, they cast a shadow of darkness upon the truths of Torah. Moreover, the concept of reincarnation detracts from the clear understanding having to do with the Tehillas HaMeisim (resurrection of the dead). Whereas, the soul is restored to the body and we are judged according to how we lived this one life that we are all given.
Furthermore, glorifying Shimon bar Yochai seems to detract from the expectation of the prophet, Eliyahu HaNavi revealing the secrets of Torah, upon his return. Incidentally, since the prophet ascended into Heaven on a chariot, his return would not be counted as reincarnation. Additionally, the role of the Messiah in part is to also, even moreso bring to light the essential Torah truths for the generation that will see his crowning as King in Jerusalem, at the beginning of the sabbatical millennium, when G-d’s Kingdom is ushered into existence. HIs light cannot be supplanted by the would-be author of the Zohar, despite how many secrets it contains. So, I believe, if studying the Zohar, we should keep in mind that time when the greater secrets will be revealed.
Ad mosai – how long until the fallen sukkah of David is restored?
“In that day will I raise up the tabernacle of David that is fallen, and close up the breaches thereof, and I will raise up his ruins, and I will build it as in the days of old.” – Amos 9:11, JPS 1917 Tanach
How well am I able to maintain an active participation in the foundational truths of my life? Do I only have an intellectual understanding of those truths? Or, am I able to ground those truths within the framework of my everyday life? Moreover, when faced with challenges, within and without, how well will that foundation prove to support the overall structure of my belief and practice?
The stronger my foundation, the greater my ability to endure the storms of life. If my foundation is like a house built upon a rock, then it will be more secure than a foundation built upon sand. A solid foundation is one that will withstand the changing seasons, because the underlying principles are founded upon timeless truths. Yet, a foundation built upon the shifting sands of societal norms will not last. Without a firm foundation we will sink into this quagmire of confusion. Without building blocks that will provide a sure foundation, a structure built upon empty truths, ultimately, will not be established.
The measure of strength of a foundation may very well be its resistance to change; therefore, only time-tested truths will ultimately prevail. The establishment of any foundation that is not in accord with those truths will ultimately fail to provide the shelter that only can only be provided through what is Heaven sent.
The Tree of Life 